In a chaotic effort to overturn the election results, President Trump and legal professionals representing his marketing campaign have spent weeks claiming with out convincing proof that rampant voter fraud corrupted vote tallies in lots of battleground states.

However their lawsuits difficult the result have repeatedly damaged down due to faulty filings, sloppy paperwork, doubtful claims by witnesses and legal professionals who’ve admitted in court docket that they weren’t alleging fraud.

Listed here are a few of the extra embarrassing moments.

Days after the election, legal professionals for the Trump marketing campaign introduced a lawsuit in Maricopa County claiming, partially, that some variety of Republican voters used Sharpies to mark their ballots, rendering them unreadable by voting machines and resulting in uncounted votes.

The grievance additionally included affidavits from a number of voters and ballot watchers who mentioned that ballot employees had capitalized on the confusion to nullify votes for Mr. Trump.

However in a listening to on Nov. 12, Kory Langhofer, a lawyer for the Trump marketing campaign, conceded that the grievance was not primarily based on proof of voter fraud however moderately on a “restricted variety of instances” of “good-faith errors” within the depend.

“This isn’t a fraud case,” Mr. Langhofer mentioned. “We’re not alleging fraud. We’re not saying anybody is attempting to steal the election.”

Below questioning, witnesses repeatedly said that they didn’t have any motive to consider that their ballots or these of different voters weren’t counted.

Later within the listening to, Daniel Arellano, the Arizona Democratic Social gathering’s counsel, directed inquiries to Zack Alcyone, one of many witnesses, who admitted that he was a enterprise associate of Mr. Langhofer’s.

Requested if he was being paid to testify within the case, Mr. Alcyone mentioned he was unsure.

“Um, not that I do know of, I haven’t mentioned it,” he mentioned.

“However you might be?” Mr. Arellano requested.

“It’s attainable, I assume, I’m unsure,” Mr. Alcyone mentioned.

A federal lawsuit introduced by the conservative lawyer L. Lin Wooden Jr. sought to halt the statewide certification of the vote in Georgia, claiming that systemic points with the election course of had marred the state’s outcomes.

Russell J. Ramsland Jr., a cybersecurity employee and an professional witness within the case, filed an affidavit on Wednesday claiming that his firm had uncovered proof of inconsistencies in digital voting machines. However the inconsistencies he claimed to determine had been in districts in Michigan, not Georgia.

The affidavit additionally listed a lot of cities and counties during which Mr. Ramsland’s evaluation ostensibly confirmed that the variety of votes solid exceeded the variety of eligible voters. However most, if not all, of the locations Mr. Ramsland listed gave the impression to be townships and counties in Minnesota, not Michigan.

In a listening to on Thursday, the Trump-appointed choose, Steven D. Grimberg, pushed again towards claims of voter fraud.

“I perceive that’s your argument, however what’s your proof?” he requested after listening to Ray S. Smith III, a lawyer for Mr. Wooden.

“To halt the certification at actually the eleventh hour would breed confusion and disenfranchisement that I discover haven’t any foundation in truth and legislation,” Decide Grimberg mentioned.

He rejected the problem.

In an opinion issued on Nov. 13, a state court docket choose in Michigan methodically dismantled testimony from six witnesses who claimed to have noticed irregularities within the vote-counting course of in Detroit.

Casting doubt on their credibility and information of the electoral course of, Decide Timothy M. Kenny famous that the witnesses had skipped an data session that will have answered lots of the questions they raised.

Maybe if plaintiffs’ election challenger affiants had attended the Oct. 29, 2020, walk-through of the TCF Heart ballot-counting location, questions and considerations may have been answered upfront of Election Day,” he wrote. “Regrettably, they didn’t and, subsequently, plaintiffs’ affiants didn’t have a full understanding” of the absentee poll tabulation course of.

In a separate case focusing on absentee ballots in Michigan, a lawyer for the Trump marketing campaign appeared to have initially filed the lawsuit in error in a federal claims court docket in Washington, D.C., that lacked the authority to listen to it.

“The grievance is captioned as if it had been filed in the USA District Court docket for the Western District of Michigan,” Decide Elaine D. Kaplan wrote in an order transferring the case to the right court docket. “As a substitute, nevertheless, it was filed with this court docket, presumably accidentally.”

Anticipating that Pennsylvania could be the tipping level within the election, legal professionals for the Trump marketing campaign ready for authorized challenges contesting votes in a number of components of the state.

In current weeks, nevertheless, the legal professionals have repeatedly acknowledged when pressed by judges that no proof of election fraud materialized.

In Federal District Court docket in Williamsport, Pa., the president’s lead lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, broke with his comments exterior the courtroom backing the president’s claims of widespread fraud.

“This isn’t a fraud case,” he instructed Decide Matthew W. Brann.

In oral arguments in a case in Montgomery County on Nov. 10, Jonathan Goldstein, a lawyer for the Trump marketing campaign, said repeatedly that he additionally had not seen proof of voter fraud within the vote that was contested there:

THE COURT: In your petition, which is correct earlier than me — and I learn it a number of instances — you don’t declare that any electors or the Board of the County had been responsible of fraud, appropriate? That’s appropriate?
MR. GOLDSTEIN: Your honor, accusing individuals of fraud is a reasonably large step. And it’s uncommon that I name any person a liar, and I’m not calling the board of the D.N.C. or anyone else concerned on this a liar. Everyone is coming to this with good religion. The D.N.C. is coming with good religion. We’re all simply attempting to get an election completed. We predict these had been a mistake, however we expect they’re a deadly mistake, and these ballots ought not be counted.
THE COURT: I perceive. I’m asking you a particular query, and I’m in search of a particular reply. Are you claiming that there’s any fraud in reference to these 592 disputed ballots?
MR. GOLDSTEIN: To my information at current, no.
THE COURT: Are you claiming that there’s any undue or improper affect upon the elector with respect to those 592 ballots?
MR. GOLDSTEIN: To my information at current, no.

Legal professionals representing the Trump marketing campaign in Bucks County signed court docket paperwork on Wednesday informing a choose that there was no proof of fraud in relation to ballots they had been contesting there.

The marketing campaign had filed swimsuit within the county’s Court docket of Widespread Pleas difficult greater than 2,200 ballots as invalid. However in a joint stipulation of facts with legal professionals for the Democratic Social gathering, the Trump marketing campaign’s legal professionals admitted, “Petitioners don’t allege, and there’s no proof of, fraud in reference to the challenged ballots.”

The legal professionals additionally said there was no proof of any “misconduct” or “impropriety” within the election.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here